PDA

View Full Version : Cop kills two (94 MPH) Milford CT


MoN
11-20-2009, 12:09 PM
This is so disturbing to hear. My heart goes out to the kids that died due to this douchbag officers decicion to disobey the law....


"MILFORD — A police videotape released Tuesday shows the car carrying two Orange teens turning directly into the path of police Officer Jason Anderson’s cruiser, which sources say was traveling at 94 mph at the moment of a fatal June collision.

Anderson’s police car and one driven by Officer Richard Pisani were going well over the 40 mph speed limit on the Boston Post Road in Orange when the teens’ car turned left to enter Dogwood Road from a turn lane on Boston Post Road."

RELATED STORY: Anderson arrest warrant released

The teenagers’ car was struck broadside by Anderson’s cruiser in a violent collision that sent sparks and debris flying, according to the video recording made by the camera in Pisani’s cruiser. It took only three seconds.

ARCHIVE COVERAGE: Read past stories here

The video footage before the accident shows Anderson’s vehicle in the right lane of Boston Post Road, passing Pisani’s cruiser in the left lane as both cars headed back toward Milford. Data collected by sensors and displayed in the video show Pisani picking up speed and doing about 65 mph as Anderson sped by.

Pisani continued to accelerate as Anderson pulled away. The digital readout shows Pisani reaching 72 mph before he applied the brakes a split second before the fatal collision occurred in front of him. The speed data came from a GPS-based speedometer on the camera.

The Milford Police Department released the video Tuesday afternoon pursuant to a request under the Freedom of Information Act filed by the New Haven Register.

Sources have said Anderson’s cruiser was traveling precisely 94 mph when it collided with the car carrying David Servin and Ashlie Krakowski, both 19, at 2:13 a.m. June 13. Both teens were killed.

The force of the crash threw Krakowski’s body 30 feet from the vehicle, while Servin had to be extricated, according to Milford police radio broadcasts of the accident.

Anderson, who is suspended with pay, turned himself in at the state police Troop I barracks in Bethany Nov. 10. He was charged with two counts of second-degree manslaughter and reckless operation of a motor vehicle. State police have declined to give any official reason why Anderson, a police officer for five years, was arrested.

Anderson is scheduled to appear in Superior Court in Derby Tuesday and is free on $250,000 bail.

Anderson’s attorney, Hugh F. Keefe of New Haven, said people should reserve judgment until all the evidence is out.

“I would caution people to be circumspect in reaching a judgment in this case. What we had is a piecemeal dissemination of evidence, which is not unusual, and only a fraction of all of the evidence has been publicized. People should be reluctant to form judgments after only seeing one piece of evidence,” Keefe said.

Given current technology “any type of conveyable evidence is going to be conveyed,” Keefe said. “It hurts a client in any criminal case only if the people who watch it jump to conclusions based on one piece of evidence.”

The police cruiser Pisani was driving that night is one of only two that has video equipment installed.

“Based on the technology we have installed, we have a better understanding of what happened,” Milford Police Chief Keith Mello said Tuesday.

Anderson and Pisani were returning to Milford from West Haven without their emergency lights or sirens on when the accident occurred. Both officers had responded to a mutual aid call of a reported riot at a club in West Haven.

Mello said he has initiated an internal affairs investigation into Pisani’s speed the night of the accident. Pisani remains on active duty.

Mello said he also launched an internal affairs investigation of Anderson Friday, after receiving a copy of Anderson’s arrest warrant affidavit.

Mello said he has not yet received a copy of the state police accident report.

“I want the public to be assured that the Milford Police Department played no role other than to provide as much information as possible to assist the state police in their investigation,” Mello said.

Anderson can only be suspended 15 days by the chief. Any additional discipline would be doled out by the Board of Police Commissioners. A special meeting of the police board will be called sometime this month to decide whether to continue Anderson’s suspension, Mello said.

The arrest warrant affidavit charging Anderson has not been released, nor has the final accident report by state police.

Bartley Halloran, the attorney representing David Servin’s estate, has filed a notice of intent to sue the city and Police Department.

Attorney John F. Wynne, who represents the Krakowski estate, said Anderson’s cruiser was traveling 94 mph and the “teens’ vehicle had no chance.”

Wynne said it’s fortunate that there is a videotape of the accident because it will help assist in both the civil and criminal trials.

Wynne said the lights were blinking yellow, which means the officers should have been traveling with caution.

“I’m not sure if Anderson was looking at Pisani, or if they were playing some game or racing? I’m not sure,” Wynne said. “We know they were not responding to a call.”

Wynne said a notice of intention to bring a complaint against the Milford Police Department and city has been filed. He said Krakowski was a student at Gateway Community College and planned on becoming a nurse.

“She was just beginning her life,” Wynne said. “Ashlie was my client’s only child. It’s still so raw. It’s something that clearly should never have been done.”

Here is a link to see the video:
Cop Kills Two Teens Speeding (http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2009/11/18/news/milford/doc4b0394233e582961926690.txt)

sleepy04
11-20-2009, 06:51 PM
“I would caution people to be circumspect in reaching a judgment in this case. What we had is a piecemeal dissemination of evidence, which is not unusual, and only a fraction of all of the evidence has been publicized. People should be reluctant to form judgments after only seeing one piece of evidence,” Keefe said.

I'm sorry, but the cop was doing 94 mph without lights and sirens. The fact that he is suspended WITH PAY even though he's been arrested is even more pathetic. Stupid cop.

MoN
11-21-2009, 09:49 AM
I'm sorry, but the cop was doing 94 mph without lights and sirens. The fact that he is suspended WITH PAY even though he's been arrested is even more pathetic. Stupid cop.

+1!!

If this was the other way around and the kid killed the cop speeding at 94 mph, there is NO way they would have posted him a bail bond, and he would def be doing 15-20 yrs....

Hex Kitten
11-21-2009, 02:26 PM
Vehicular manslaughter anyone?

I'm dismayed at the shit cops get away with. This is ridiculous, but unfortunately, I'm not surprised at all.

MoN
11-22-2009, 09:55 AM
I just heard the cops getting charged w/ two counts of vehicular manslaughter... lets see how much time he'll actually do....

SubyGirl8330
11-22-2009, 01:45 PM
wow thats nuts!

xxthat girlxx
11-22-2009, 02:48 PM
I watched this video at least 5 times. While I think the cop should be charged, the driver/passenger were obviously inexperienced drivers. They should have been able to see from when they started to turn that the officer's vehicle was driving at a VERY high rate of speed. They should not have turned and I find them partially at fault for this tragic accident.

sleepy04
11-22-2009, 05:26 PM
I watched this video at least 5 times. While I think the cop should be charged, the driver/passenger were obviously inexperienced drivers. They should have been able to see from when they started to turn that the officer's vehicle was driving at a VERY high rate of speed. They should not have turned and I find them partially at fault for this tragic accident.


That's crap. The officer is TOTALLY AT FAULT here and to even try to find the kids responsible is stupid. They had NO REASON to expect the officer to be traveling at nearly 3 times the posted limit. maybe 40 or 45 but not 94 mph.

The majority of people are not good at judging how fast something is traveling, and at night, with the amount of street lighting from the video, it gets even harder. If you look at the video, the officer had a blinking yellow light, so HE SHOULD HAVE ALREADY BEEN EXERCISING CAUTION IN HIS DRIVING. We've all had times when we've miss judged something, whether pulling out in front of somebody or whatever.

This was not the kids fault at all, this was the officer and he should be fired and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

jessickascarling
11-23-2009, 08:01 PM
That's crap. The officer is TOTALLY AT FAULT here and to even try to find the kids responsible is stupid. They had NO REASON to expect the officer to be traveling at nearly 3 times the posted limit. maybe 40 or 45 but not 94 mph.

The majority of people are not good at judging how fast something is traveling, and at night, with the amount of street lighting from the video, it gets even harder. If you look at the video, the officer had a blinking yellow light, so HE SHOULD HAVE ALREADY BEEN EXERCISING CAUTION IN HIS DRIVING. We've all had times when we've miss judged something, whether pulling out in front of somebody or whatever.

This was not the kids fault at all, this was the officer and he should be fired and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

i don't think it's total crap, i think the cop had the right of way. either way, it doesn't make it okay though, i agree the cop is totally to blame. he shouldn't have been going that fast and if he wouldn't have been they would've had time to turn.

Jonathan
12-24-2009, 01:42 AM
I watched this video at least 5 times. While I think the cop should be charged, the driver/passenger were obviously inexperienced drivers. They should have been able to see from when they started to turn that the officer's vehicle was driving at a VERY high rate of speed. They should not have turned and I find them partially at fault for this tragic accident.
While I agree that knowing how to use ones depth perception to judge the rate of speed of the approaching car would have saved these kids lives, there is no expectation of such a capability in order to obtain a license. In fact many people are legally operating motor vehicles on public roads with sight in only one eye. paultg on NASIOC is one such person. Such people have serious difficulties in their depth perception skills.

While police officers are allowed to exceed posted speed limits to some extend, they are never suppose to do this with out FULL lights on, and they are expected to keep their speeds down to a safe level.

That police officer was traveling better than 123 feet/second, meaning that when this young driver started to cross the left side of the road, the officer was better than 370 feet away. This is far enough away that by any normal driving standard the intersection would have been perceived as being "clear".

The officer was traveling so fast that by the time that the image of the car in his path reached his brain it was already too late to do anything about it.

While an experienced and fully alert professional racing car driver could possibly have noticed the high rate of speed of the oncoming car and maybe even have taken evasive actions, in this situation a young and likely inexperienced driver driving at ~ 2:30 AM is certainly not expected to be driving to such a high standard.

In my personal opinion the police officer was 100 % responsible for that devastating impact.

xxthat girlxx
12-24-2009, 11:01 AM
I don't disagree with you Jonathan. Very unfortunate mistakes were made.

snowman87
12-24-2009, 02:20 PM
That's crap. The officer is TOTALLY AT FAULT here and to even try to find the kids responsible is stupid. They had NO REASON to expect the officer to be traveling at nearly 3 times the posted limit. maybe 40 or 45 but not 94 mph.

The majority of people are not good at judging how fast something is traveling, and at night, with the amount of street lighting from the video, it gets even harder. If you look at the video, the officer had a blinking yellow light, so HE SHOULD HAVE ALREADY BEEN EXERCISING CAUTION IN HIS DRIVING. We've all had times when we've miss judged something, whether pulling out in front of somebody or whatever.

This was not the kids fault at all, this was the officer and he should be fired and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

I don't know if it has been mentioned or not here yet, however the Tox reports came back from the two 19 year olds and they were both found to be well over the legal limit to be driving. (I believe they were both over twice the limit but don't quote me)

While I do agree that the officer demonstrated an massive lack of judgment in this situation, he is not entirely to blame.

MoN
12-24-2009, 07:47 PM
I don't know if it has been mentioned or not here yet, however the Tox reports came back from the two 19 year olds and they were both found to be well over the legal limit to be driving. (I believe they were both over twice the limit but don't quote me)

While I do agree that the officer demonstrated an massive lack of judgment in this situation, he is not entirely to blame.

Thanks for the update but it doesn't budge my first opinion... the cop is still def to blame in my eyes, had he not been flying at 90mph two young people would not have died. Say their drunk selves would have turned out in front of him doing 40mph or whatever the limit was then ya they would have crashed, been at fault, but most likely would have survived and had their license suspended for a DUI. There is a huge difference in the outcome of the situation had the cop reduced his speed when he had no where to go in the first place besides mess around and kill time (O ya and two people)....

08vtwrx
12-25-2009, 04:13 AM
Drunk or not and if I where making a left turn and saw oncoming traffic I would assume those vehicles (in this case the cop) be doing the speed limit of 40mph. Therefore, if a vehicle looked to be a safe distance away I would have time to turn in front of the oncoming traffic. But since the cop was going over 2x the speed limit with no siren that would throw off my preception of him doing the posted speed limit.

Yellow lights mean SLOW DOWN not to speed up.

snowman87
12-25-2009, 01:47 PM
Drunk or not and if I where making a left turn and saw oncoming traffic I would assume those vehicles (in this case the cop) be doing the speed limit of 40mph. Therefore, if a vehicle looked to be a safe distance away I would have time to turn in front of the oncoming traffic. But since the cop was going over 2x the speed limit with no siren that would throw off my preception of him doing the posted speed limit.

Yellow lights mean SLOW DOWN not to speed up.

NEVER assume anything when your driving. Never assume the other driver is going to yield to you. Or that they are going to follow any of the rules of the road.

I am not by any means trying to start an argument but those are just general rules to drive by, they have kept me from getting into some major accidents due to some really boneheaded drivers I have come across. And I would highly suggest that everyone does the same, it can really save your ass.

08vtwrx
12-25-2009, 03:22 PM
NEVER assume anything when your driving. Never assume the other driver is going to yield to you. Or that they are going to follow any of the rules of the road.

I am not by any means trying to start an argument but those are just general rules to drive by, they have kept me from getting into some major accidents due to some really boneheaded drivers I have come across. And I would highly suggest that everyone does the same, it can really save your ass.

I'm just sayin whats the odds of someone doing 94mph in a 40. If they where doing 60mph it would have been a close call but no accident. Anyways I would like to see the cop loose his badge, license, and his freedom for a stunt like that. He violated many laws including, speeding for sure, unsafe operation of a motor vehicle, "racing", traveling over the speed limit with no siren, passing on the right, and the list could go on. My good friends brother is a cop and I showed him the link and he totally backs me up.

sleepy04
12-27-2009, 01:51 PM
I don't know if it has been mentioned or not here yet, however the Tox reports came back from the two 19 year olds and they were both found to be well over the legal limit to be driving. (I believe they were both over twice the limit but don't quote me)

While I do agree that the officer demonstrated an massive lack of judgment in this situation, he is not entirely to blame.

Can you please provide a link backing this up... I googled it and only could find references to the original story.

Even still, this really has very little bearing on the cops guilt in this. Yeah, if they weren't impaired, they might have not made the turn. But that can't really be said for sure. They might have still decided to make the turn.

What can be said definitely is that if the cop HAD NOT been going 94mph, those kids would most likely be alive. At even 60mph, the cop could possibly have had time to react and stop the car. The impact would probably not have been nearly as severe. At 94mph, by the time he SAW the car and his brain processed the information, it was to late.

I still maintain the cop should be fired, and prosecuted for manslaughter.

snowman87
12-27-2009, 06:12 PM
Can you please provide a link backing this up... I googled it and only could find references to the original story.

Even still, this really has very little bearing on the cops guilt in this. Yeah, if they weren't impaired, they might have not made the turn. But that can't really be said for sure. They might have still decided to make the turn.

What can be said definitely is that if the cop HAD NOT been going 94mph, those kids would most likely be alive. At even 60mph, the cop could possibly have had time to react and stop the car. The impact would probably not have been nearly as severe. At 94mph, by the time he SAW the car and his brain processed the information, it was to late.

I still maintain the cop should be fired, and prosecuted for manslaughter.

I'll see if I can find it, I caught a glimpse on the news the other day. I think it was on channel 3.

08vtwrx
12-27-2009, 10:31 PM
Can you please provide a link backing this up... I googled it and only could find references to the original story.

Even still, this really has very little bearing on the cops guilt in this. Yeah, if they weren't impaired, they might have not made the turn. But that can't really be said for sure. They might have still decided to make the turn.

What can be said definitely is that if the cop HAD NOT been going 94mph, those kids would most likely be alive. At even 60mph, the cop could possibly have had time to react and stop the car. The impact would probably not have been nearly as severe. At 94mph, by the time he SAW the car and his brain processed the information, it was to late.

I still maintain the cop should be fired, and prosecuted for manslaughter.

I wonder if the cops where under the influence of drugs or alcohol and is being covered up by the town. Dont get me wrong but stuff like that has happened before.

Superwomanchick
12-28-2009, 01:27 AM
I think the cop should be locked up for a very long time. But when I watched the video if it was me in the other car I wouldn't have turned, It looks like the cop was already pretty close when he was turning, close enough that it should've been obvious he was speeding. I had an older woman turn in front of me exactly like that when I was going 45 in a 45, my parents mint condition mini s was totaled because of it, luckily my reaction time was good and that car was tough or else I wouldn't have walked away from it. Some people just don't have that good of depth perception or judgment, which is why I say if you hesitate just don't go, because by the time you're done deciding on going it's too late and you don't have time. That said, 95 is just f-ing ridiculous. 20 above is a felony, just because they have a badge does not mean they can do whatever they want. Cops need to understand this. He better get the same sentence anyone else would.